TEUN VAN SAMBEEK
	22 DECEMBER 2024

The word “voluntaryism“ is marked as a spelling error when I type this, making me believe I’w writing this for the fringes of society. So I checked Google why it seems that I’m typing it wrong, which led me to Wikipedia to get confirmation the word exists:

“Voluntaryism (sometimes voluntarism) is used to describe the philosophy of Auberon Herbert, and later that of the authors and supporters of The Voluntaryist magazine, which supports a voluntary-funded state (i.e. ”the Voluntary State”), meaning a lack of coercion and force in matters such as taxation.“

If you ask me to set the stage we are currently living in, I would do it like this:

“We live in a society where people are clearly forced by governments to pay taxes and where people are also forced to pay less obvious “taxing“ amounts of money to stay alive. Especially inflation can be extremely taxing. To survive this ever increasing financial tax to stay alive, people have been able to increase their productivity massively. But whatever people achieve, it never seems to be enough. Currently every country is in massive financial debt and the media wants us to believe that the chaos the debt causes is the main reason for the looming or already ongoing WWIII.”

People however live in Plato’s cave and are so massively indoctrinated that they can't see that “Governments“ and “Companies“ are not theirs. Governments and companies are tools that are controlled by a tiny group of people we allow to print money out of thin air. This tiny group of people uses this privilege ultimately to protect their interests. Therefor, the main interest for these “Money Printers“ is to stay hidden to the public and keep the people weak and divided. To do this, these hidden forces literally have endless amounts of money and with that are in full control of our governments, companies and financial system, including cash, cryptocurrencies and precious metals.

Luckily - through the arrival of the internet - a fast growing group of people is now leaving Plato’s cave, talking to other people to expose what is happening and working on solutions to leave the horrible path society is put on.

For me it meant I needed to use logic, as that is my only compass in the darkness of the cave. And the logic is quite simple:

1. The only answer to a government that only knows violence to convince people of their obvious lies, is a “government” based on voluntary principles.

2. The only answer to allowing a small group of people the monopoly on printing money out of thin air, is a system where everyone shares equally in the creation of money.

3. The only answer to allowing a small group of people the monopoly on insight in everyone’s financial transactions is to allow everyone insight in everyone’s financial transactions.

There are many arguments why “hybrid“ solutions will not work. The main reason being that any solution that will not fundamentally cuts the cord between money and power is always worse that a solution that does this as a default.

When you create a better type of money, there are several choices to make:

1. The first choice that needs to made, is if it is necessary to create money at all? In this world of abundance (let no-one fool you) money should not be necessary. People living in simple villages can easy survive without money. That is - until other people start to plunder them. When you however believe that there is something like `the human project` where resources are shared, processed and distributed to create better life for everyone, then you'll see that barter is much less efficient than using money. When you decide to be using money, you need to look at the next choices:

2. The second choice is about money creation. You can give a special group of people the privilege to create money and to decide who to give it to, or you can democratize money creation by design. Allowing a dedicated group to have this monopoly is quite insane as it will always be used to extend the power of this group and their friends. So to democratize the inception of coins by giving for example everyone one coin per hour and then devaluing all coins by a factor (to limit the amount of coins per living human that will be circulating), is the only logical alternative. It is also perfect, because it removes the possibility for any group to fight with other people to obtain any privilege to issue money, while refusing others this same right. This right to equally receive fresh issued money should actually become a basic human right.

3. The third choice is about insight in financial dealings of other people. Like preventing anybody to get a monopoly of issuing money, no special group should be able to get the sole right of checking other peoples financial situation and spending. The reason for this is that - if a group has the sole right to check anyone's financial dealings - it means that nobody else is able to check the financial dealings of the people in this group which would allow them to - for example - create money for themselves without anybody noticing. Having insight in anyone else’s financial dealings should therefore also be turned into a basic human right.

These 3 choices are based on simple logic and are necessary to prevent any theft or corruption related to money. It frankly is the only way to make money ethical. Now how do you use this logic to create a new system?

Key for any alternative system is the way how money will be created and distributed. In every financial system, coins first need to be created. Lets go through some different financial systems and see what could be a fair way to create and distribute coins. And remember that we only look at the way how coins are created and distributed direct after creation. We are not yet looking at how people can increase their amount of money by providing products or services.

In this model everyone would receive an equal portion of the coins that are created. This immediately raises several questions. What to do with people that are on the brink of death or just have died, or just were born or are about to be born? Do you make distribution models for these situations and how do you do that fairly. And what to do with people that are born in the future and what to do with large families, with people that are in a coma or are too disabled to work. What to do with inheritance. It is easy to see that it will be impossible to make this model fair. Also issues like theft are quite complicated. What to do when the lump sum that you have received and need to help you through life is suddenly gone. It is very unclear how to take care of those situations.

In Bitcoin, the miners with the most computing power will create the most coins. It is immediately clear that this way of coin creation is very unfair to people that don't possess any computing power at all. Also the factor luck plays a role in the decision who receives the value of the newly created bitcoin. Finally the protocol that will restrict the amount of coins to be created will cause many of the same issues as under 1. like not being fair to people that are not yet born. Other cryptocurrency protocols (like Qortal) where not the computing power but your online connection time to that blockchain determines how much coins you will get, should be considered as a much fairer. So however Qortal is much fairer than Bitcoin, it is still completely unfair to people without proper (cheap) internet and proper laptops. The conclusion should be that as long as a cryptocurrency doesn't distribute all it's coins equally over all people on society, it is extremely unfair. Wealth distribution would be even worse than the current financial system if crypto would replace the entire financial system today.

It is easy to see that it is almost impossible to define working hours and to value working hours in a fair way. For example: What do you do with jobs that require very long education programs? How do you value talent or people that work faster than others? Or how do you define jobs? Is taking care of your kids or parents a job? What do you do with people that are not able to work? What do you do with people who's jobs are taken by AI. There seems no proper way to organize this type of coin creation in a fair way.

This type can be paid yearly, monthly, weekly, daily or even per hour to people that are alive. Whichever type you choose, it is clear that every living human will receive the same portions of coins as anybody else. When you would do this with physical coins, creation and distribution per month of year would be more practical. When coins are distributed digitally, the hourly option would provide the most accurate distribution. Regardless of jobs or education, everyone shares an exact equal portion of all the money that is created in that period of time.

To connect lifetime to the creation of coins is obviously the fairest way to create money. That is why we have chosen this type of money creation and distribution to be the basis for an alternative financial system.

Before making some other logical choices for a new system, we first need to address a the difference between 'Personal Money Creation' and 'Universal Basic Income' (also known as 'UBI').

UBI used to be the abbreviation of 'Unconditional Basic Income'. Tests with Unconditional Basic Income have been done in the recent past. Contrary to what many people believed is that people with an UBI didn't resort to being idle and start becoming alcoholics or drugs abusers. Instead people with an UBI mostly invested their capital in production goods that allowed them to become more productive and grow their businesses faster.

UBI used to be the abbreviation of 'Unconditional Basic Income'. Tests with Unconditional Basic Income have been done in the recent past. Contrary to what many people believed is that people with an UBI didn't resort to being idle and start becoming alcoholics or drugs abusers. Instead people with an UBI mostly invested their capital in production goods that allowed them to become more productive and grow their businesses faster.

The globalists however want communism. That is the reason the 'U' of UBI was changed from 'Unconditional' to 'Universal'. The people that print money out of nowhere, don't have issues with using their freshly free printed money to pay people a Basic Income as long as it is completely “conditional” and all the people need to serve them.

Universal Basic Income is something completely different than fair and unconditional distributed newly created money. In the Universal Basic Income System, you will be forced to work for any created money next to all the other conditions.

A financial system can only be ethical when there is a fully Unconditional Equal distribution of all newly created money. Once installed, nobody is allowed to decide about the amount or frequency of payment of any newly created money. This is the exact opposite of a Universal Basic Income.

Another massive difference is that UBI is still largely money that has earlier been collected by the government as tax. So the people that are taxed actually have the burden to provide the money for the handout. In a system with inflation and other extraction systems for the owners of that financial system, the public will find it increasingly more difficult to provide the taxes to finance the UBI system while the people that print the money will extract any remaining wealth. In the system 1CoinH proposes, this issue doesn't exist.

The main reason to turn our current financial system into a cashless society is that a full digital system - that is completely controlled by the owners of the financial system and the governments they control - is a perfect tool for totalitarianism. When all transactions are digital, the banks - that have a monopoly on insight in your transactions - will now not only be able to see every transaction you do, but with the help of AI they can also influence or even prevent you to do any spending that might be against their political agenda. They will create zones where your wallet only works, they can put an expiry date on your UBI savings, they can put you on vegetarian diets and limit the range of your electric car. A cashless society based on the current financial system will result in the dystopian situation many tyrants dream of.

This situation raises an important question for the creation of an alternative financial system: Do you still want to use digital systems to check and validate transactions?

Also this can be solved with logic. Like we don't want a small group of people to have the monopoly on money creation, we shouldn't allow a similar small group the monopoly on insight in all financial transactions. If we don't allow a small group the monopoly on insight in all transaction than there is only one alternative: Grant everyone insight in the financial transactions. Or at least in all transactions that are relevant to you as a user. Once everything is in the open, it will be much more difficult for any would-be-tyrant to treat groups of people unfair compared to other groups, because this will be noticed immediately, allowing people to give the proper reaction.

A system where everyone has insight in all transactions (that are relevant to you) is the only alternative to having a small group with a monopoly on insight. You might think that having no insight at all is also a alternative. There are cryptocurrencies like Monero and Pirate Chain where nobody has insight. The problem with having no insight at all is that it conflicts with the fair distribution of fresh created money. To be sure that a human doesn't receive more than 1 share (or portion) of the fresh created money, other people must be able to check if a participation stream of new created money is only connected once to a particular human. So insight is essential. This doesn't mean crypto like Monero or Pirate Chain can never be used. Once the money is created in an ethical way, this money can be used to buy yourself for example Monero coins. It is however important that this is done in a new Monero blockchain where Monero is only bought with ethical money. This is because you should never mix unethical money with ethical money. It would namely stain the ethical money since you don’t want corrupt banks to buy massive amounts of ethical Money with their unethical fiat currency.

The logical conclusion is that ethical money (money that is created in a fair way) must allow all participants to have full insight in transactions and by doing so, breaking the monopoly of insight banks have currently. So by building privacy systems on top of ethical money, people can have financial privacy where also corrupt or criminal transactions can be done. Privacy systems should be allowed because corrupt and criminal transactions can also be done with precious metals or precious stones. It is societies task to prevent illegal activities. It is not the task of a financial system to do this. Ethical money can prevent corruption and financial crime, which is a feature that is not possible in our current Fiat-system.

Let's take a broad estimate. Assuming a global debt of US$240,000,000,000,000. When we have a world population of 8 Billion people and all money in circulation has started as debt, then you can calculate that there is about US$30,000 of money per living human in circulation. If all this money was actually within reach of the common man and we would replace the financial system with a new system where we add 30,000 coins per human, then a coin would resemble a purchase power of about 1 US Dollar. Most of the money in circulation is however out of reach of the average common man. So to create a coin with a similar purchasing power as the US Dollar, much less coins should be created. That is why we think that 20,000 coins per living human should be sufficient and should represent a recognizable value in range of the Dollar or the Euro.

As indicated before, a system where a number of coins are distributed every hour over the entire world population would be the fairest system.

Now to make calculation easy, let's assume every human receives 1 coin every hour. This means a human receives 365.25 (the extra .25 is because of the extra day of the leap year, divided by 4 years) times 24 hours is 8,766 coins per year.

When we create a system where everyone receives 1 coin per hour, the money supply would simply keep increasing forever and as a result of that, the value of money would constantly keep dropping. This is not what you want. What you want is a constant money supply of around let's say 20,000 coins per living human. This amount should be constant at a moment not too far into the future and keep being constant. It is allowed to grow with the actual world population, as long as we have about 20,000 coins per human in circulation, to avoid any inflation as a result from an increasing money supply.

To get this stable supply of money we simply need to use a depreciation factor over all money that is in circulation. With a depreciation percentage, the money supply will over time become constant per human, and that is exactly what you want, because in a constant state of the money supply (money without inflation) the sense of what the value of an object is, becomes stable in the end. Only when productivity changes, you will see changes in the price of the produced items. This usually benefits customers, because normally productivity increases which means that prices usually will get a bit cheaper in this system.

To convert yearly depreciation (D) to hourly, the following formula is used:

Dh = 1 - ((1-Dy)^(1/8766))

(where 8766 is the number of hours per year and ”Dh” is the depreciation factor per hour.)

We did some iterations and a depreciation factor of 0.99995 per hour (20,000/20.001 = 0.99995, which is a yearly depreciation of 35.4875%) makes sure the amount of coins that is created per human won't ever go over 20,000 coins. This depreciation factor results in a situation that a human will accumulate 7,097 coins in the first year. This is in the 8766 hours that pass each year. The amount is reduced because ever hour all the coins are accumulated in this year will automatically reduce with 0.005% (1 minus 0.99995) every hour that passes.

At this rate each human accumulates 18,000 coins within 5 years and 3 months which is 90% of the maximum achievable 20,000 coins. Within ten and a half year each human has 'created' 19,800 coins, which is 99% of their maximum amount.

After 22 years and 7 months each human has 'created' 19.999 coins, but will never reach 20,000 (self created) coins in their lifetime because the 19,999 coins the human has created will reduce with 1 coin in the hour that the new 20,000th coin is created.

20,000 Coins per human doesn't look much. But remember that a family of five will 'create' 100,000 coins for themselves. Coins that have an estimated value of about 1 US$ per coin. Next to that you need to remember that this financial system starts with a hard reset, meaning that everybody stops paying their mortgages, rent, lease, loans and taxes once the current financial system collapses and nobody accepts the Central Bank Digital Currencies. It means that all the real estate where people live and cars the people drive in are 'taken for free'. All these items will be registered on their names in new land and car registries that will have to be created. This is necessary to take back the property that was stolen by the corrupt banking system. That would be a proper start for a proper and fair new financial system. When your house and car is free, 20,000 coins per human as money that is in circulation is suddenly quite a lot, especially when you consider that inflation is eliminated because the money supply is constant relative to the number of humans in the new financial system. Finally we will have a financial system without inflation. This means that also the nonsensical confusing of inflation with economic growth finally will end.

When we use 35.5% as depreciation of the one coin per hour everyone receives, the global money supply gets constant after about 22 years. Because there was no moment in history where wealth is properly distributed, it is difficult to predict if people have a big enough incentive to be productive. It is highly probable that we need a strong financial incentive for people to be creative and productive. To keep the circulation of money high, we have chosen to set the depreciation factor 35.5% per year. This high percentage should be a strong enough stimulus for people to get active in a situation where the houses and cars are already in possession of the people.

So how can we create an extreme simple 1CoinH application. Currently we do this by creating financial segment on this website. Anyone can simply subscribe and become a user. There you need to add some personal data, including your email address, and will then receive your coins.

When you do a transaction, the transaction data is stored in the database of the website, next to the personal data of the buyer and seller. We advise people to do a video-call with the buyer or seller you transact with before agreeing on the transaction. In the video-call you can check if the other human really exists and resembles their user-data. With every transaction, you receive a confirmation by email so you will know very fast if your account is hacked and where your coins went to.

You may understand now already that it is very difficult to steal coins, because everything is transparent and traceable. There is also a button that you can use to download the entire financial history from any human you want. We advise everyone to download the data of every human you transact with direct after the transaction is finished so you can see where you received coins from or sent coins to. This can even be an email setting.

The website obviously helps you to send coins or to accept them. You will be able to trace the coins to the human that created them. This is called 'Originating'. Originating must be part of the system, because you must be able to refuse coins of people you don’t have any data from. But that is it. Fraud or errors (that lead to corrections in data by the 1CoinH organization – which is needed in any centralized financial system) will be made visible in the users data with the reasons of the correction.

Every human receives 1 coin per hour. But at what moment a human starts to receive his coins? To keep things fair and simple we’ve chosen January 1st, 2022 at 01:00 hour to be the moment everyone receives his first coin, unless you are born after that moment. When you are born after January 1st, 2022 at 01:00, you will receive 1 coin per hour from your birthday, also at 01:00 hour. This means for all people (outside the newborns) that – should they start using the 1CoinH for example 1000 days after January 1st, 2022 at 01:00, they would start with 24 x 1000 = 24,000 coins. Because of depreciation, this will be quite a bit less: 13,976.30 coins.

In your 1CoinH history, the first number in the Initial string is the birth-hour, calculated with January 1st, 2022 at 00:00 as zero. All the hours a human lived before this “moment zero” are calculated and stored with a minus sign. All births after “moment zero” are positive. With the “birth-hour” number, program can easily calculate the coins each human has personally created.

It needs to be noted that the start-coins will all be depreciated immediately. This can be calculated in a loop from 'moment zero' to the current hour:

var owncoin = 0;

for (i = 0; i < hournow; i++) {owncoin=(owncoin*0.99995)+1;}

In the month December 2024 we were testing the system with over 30 people to give everyone the sense what it means to receive one coin per hour and have a stack of coins that depreciates at a quite high rate at the same time. But also what it means to be able to see other peoples transactions and be responsible who you trust in the system. You can go to our Telegram group to see the developments and find out how you can join the test group. Our website and the entire test can be viewed in 68 languages. Also this story can be read there in 68 languages.

Having a tiny group of people controlling the money supply will always lead to efforts by a combination of governments, banks and companies that will use force to remain and increase their power. When a fair way of distributing newly created coins is the basis of your financial system and everyone is able to check everyone’s dealings, it will be extremely difficult for criminals and corrupt politicians to blackmail common people. Obviously criminals will find other ways to get an advantage over others, but we also should remember that when we get rid of the current wealth extracting system we are currently in, the need for criminal behavior to just survive will not be present anymore which should provide the best environment for a society based on voluntaryism.

The choices we made above are all based on the logic that is presented. We invite anyone to challenge the logic and also present better systems for a financial system that leads to a society based on voluntaryism at the same time. Until now we didn't receive any argument that discredited our choices. So please contact us to present any remarks. It will be very welcome.

22 December 2024

Teun van Sambeek MSc, MRE

Creator of: 1CoinH & Copiania